The Tribunal allowed an interlocutory application seeking permission to withdraw the application due to an amended settlement, granting refund of court fees.
Original Application (OA No.894 of 2023) dismissed as withdrawn; court fees directed for refund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.13
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2028 of 2023 In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.894 of 2023
Bank of Baroda
… Applicant
Versus
M/s. G. Chimanlal and Co. Jain … Defendant
Mr Anup Khaitan – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 8th March 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
08.03.2024
Sr. No.13
| OA No.894 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Bank of Baroda Vs. M/s. G. Chimanlal and Co. Jain |
| Mr Anup Khaitan – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in I.A. No.2028 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2028 of 2023, Original Application No.894 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Bank of Baroda
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
