The Debts Recovery Tribunal permitted the withdrawal of Appeal No.6 of 2023. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by mutual consent without order as to costs.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
08.03.2024
Sr. No.31
| Appeal No.6 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr Mohammed Nabil Qureshi Vs. M/s. Vaibhav Timber and Plywood & Ors. |
| Mr Jamshed Ansari and Ms Misbah Ansari – Advocates for the appellant. Ms N.I. Bakali – Advocate for respondent no.5. None for other respondents. |
||
| 1. Mr Ansari, representing the appellant, endorsed seeking the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Appeal in view of the pendency before the learned Recovery Officer of the I.A. filed under Rule 11 of the 2ndschedule of the Income Tax Act. 2. Ms Bakali, representing the 5threspondent/certificate holder, does not object to the withdrawal of the Appeal. 3. By consent of the parties, Appeal No.6 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Mr Mohammed Nabil Qureshi
M/s. Vaibhav Timber and Plywood
Mr Jamshed Ansari
Ms Misbah Ansari
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
