The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed a securitisation application for want of prosecution after the applicant ceased attending the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
08.03.2024 Sr. No.61
| SA No.109 of 2022 |
||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Bharat Lekhumal Harwani Vs. Fullerton India Credit Ltd. |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar shows that since 6thJune 2022, the applicant stopped attending the case. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Securitisation Application No.109 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Bharat Lekhumal Harwani
Fullerton India Credit Ltd.
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
