The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed Securitisation Application No.49 of 2022 for want of prosecution after the applicant failed to appear or take any steps to proceed with the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
05.01.2024
Sr. No.25
| SA No.49 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Pariket Realstate Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union Bank of India |
| None for the applicant. Mr Vipin Chandra i/b M/s. N.N. Amin & Co. – Advocates for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order-sheet dated 16thAugust 2023 shows that the applicant has failed to enter appearance and has failed to take any steps to proceed with the matter, and |
||
| therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the |
||
| advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, |
||
| Securitisation Application No.49 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Pariket Realstate Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Union Bank of India
Hon'ble Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
