Tribunal permitted withdrawal of Original Application due to amicable settlement between parties, ordered refund of court fees and return of documents.
Permission granted to withdraw the Original Application; court fees to be refunded and original documents returned; other pending IAs disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.25
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2252 of 2023
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.1102 of 2023
SICOM Ltd.
… Applicant
Versus
Rushi Realty India Pvt. Ltd. … Defendant
Mr P. Kumar Jain i/b M/s. Prakash Panjabi & Co. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 4th January 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer,
DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
04.01.2024
Sr. No.25
| OA No.1102 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
SICOM Ltd. Vs. Rushi Realty India Pvt. Ltd. |
| Mr P. Kumar Jain i/b M/s. Prakash Panjabi & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in I.A. No.2252 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2252 of 2023, O.A. No.1102 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. |
||
| 3. The learned Registrar is directed to (i) refund the court fees and (ii) return the original documents as per the Rules. 4. All pending IAs stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
SICOM Ltd.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
