The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed, for want of prosecution, an application filed by Gokul Sugars Industries Ltd. against Union Bank of India because the applicant failed to appear or take steps to proceed.
Securitisation Application No.327 of 2022 stood dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
05.01.2024
Sr. No.32
| SA No.327 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Gokul Sugars Industries Ltd.1 Vs. Union Bank of India |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. Order-sheet dated 27thOctober 2023 shows that the applicant has failed to enter appearance and has failed to take any steps to proceed with the matter, and therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by |
||
| the applicant either personally or through the | ||
| advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Securitisation Application No.327 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Gokul Sugars Industries Ltd.
Union Bank of India
Hon'ble Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
