Miscellaneous Application disposing of the dispute where the applicant refused to sign an affidavit for return of original documents. The application was disposed of, and the Registrar was directed to return the documents.
Return of original documents by the Registrar
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
05.01.2024
Sr. No.9
| MA No.44 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Naresh Kanayalal Rajwani Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank |
| Mr Uttam S. Rane – Advocate for the applicant. Mr Vinay Deshpande and Ms Shobha Chavan i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co. – Advocates for defendant. |
||
| 1. Mr Deshpande, representing the secured creditor, submits that the applicant has complied and paid the entire amount as claimed by it as per the secured creditor’s policy for returning of the original documents/title deeds. The applicant has to sign the |
||
| affidavit but he refused to do so. The secured | ||
| 8 | creditor, through the counsel, has filed pursis alongwith five documents (exhibit-8), which are taken |
|
| on record. Based on the pursis (exhibit-8), |
||
| Miscellaneous Application No.44 of 2023 stands disposed of. 2. The applicant to appear before the learned Registrar for return of the documents. The learned Registrar is directed to return the original documents as per the Rules. Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Naresh Kanayalal Rajwani
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
