The Tribunal disposed of Securitisation Application No. 198 of 2023 and all pending interlocutory applications upon the applicant submitting joint pursis, without awarding costs.
Securitisation Application No. 198 of 2023 and all pending interlocutory applications disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
03.01.2024
Sr. No.12
| SA No.198 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Munir Abdul Latif Gazi & Ors. Vs. Asset Reconstruction Company (I) Ltd. & Ors. |
| Mr M. N. Bagadia – Advocate for the applicants. | ||
| Mr Munir Abdul Latif Gazi – applicant no.1 present in person. Mr Bhalchandra Palav and Mr Aniket Dighe i/b M/s. Bhal & Co. – Advocates for defendant no.2. Mr Jitendra Pitale- authorised officer for defendant no.2. None for other defendants. |
||
| 10 | 1. The learned counsel for the parties has presented joint pursis (exhibit-10), which is taken on record. Mr Bagadia, representing the applicant, requests the Tribunal to dispose of the Securitisation Application upon compliance of clause 6 of the consent terms. |
|
| Request accepted. Accordingly, Securitisation Application No.198 of 2023 stands disposed of with no order as to costs. 2. All pending Interlocutory Applications stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Munir Abdul Latif Gazi
Asset Reconstruction Company (I) Ltd.
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
