The Tribunal, noting an amicable settlement and full repayment of the dues, allowed the withdrawal of the interlocutory application. Consequently, the original recovery application stood dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
The Original Application No.1151 of 2023 was dismissed as withdrawn; the Interlocutory Application No.2411 of 2023 was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.22
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2411 of 2023 In
ORIGINALAPPLICATION NO.1151 of 2023
ICICI Bank Ltd. … Applicant
Versus
Parmeshwar Rathod & Ors.
… Defendants
Ms Sanika Athalye i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer,nd January 2024.
ORDER
Sd/- (Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
02.01.2024 Sr. No.22
| OA No.1151 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Parmeshwar Rathod & Ors. |
| Ms Sanika Athalye i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.2411 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2411 of 2023, Original Application No.1151 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Radhika | Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
