The Debts Recovery Tribunal (Aurangabad) dismissed a securitisation application (No. 62/2022) due to non-prosecution as the applicant did not appear and stated lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Securitisation Application No.62/2022 is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 20. Sr. |
04.20 No.28 |
23 SA No.62/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.62/2022 | ||
| Ratan Kondiba Dhongade ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India ..Respondent None for the applicant. None for the respondent. The matter is taken through VC. 1. In this matter the service affidavit has not been filed. Applicants are not appearing. |
||
| 2. Today none appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing: ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.62/2022 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the record room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.62/2022) Page 1 of 1
Ratan Kondiba Dhongade
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
