Securitisation Application No. 225/2022 dismissed in default for non-prosecution as applicant failed to appear.
Securitisation Application No. 225/2022 dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
20.04.2023
| Sr. No | .33 SA No. 225/2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No. 225/2022 | ||
| Sanjay Sardar Pawar ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India & another ..Respondents None for the applicant. Mr. R.C. Patil - Advocate for the respondent no.1. None for the other respondents. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. In this matter the service affidavit has not been filed. However the State Bank of India’s counsel files his appearance. None for other respondents. 2. The applicant was absent on 11thApril, 2023. Today also none appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. |
||
| 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.225/2022 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.225/2022) Page 1 of 1
Sanjay Sardar Pawar
State Bank of India
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
