Dismissed
Suvarna Vilas Pardeshi v. Union Bank of India
DRTSA/408/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
¶2
| 18. Sr. |
04.20 No.2 |
23 1 SA No.408/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.408/2022 | ||
| Suvarna Vilas Pardeshi ..Applicant Versus Union Bank of India ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. A.A. Mishra- Advocate for the respondent-bank. The matter is taken through Video Conference. |
||
| 1. In this matter interims orders were passed. The applicant was directed to deposit the certain amount. According to the respondent-bank the applicant has not deposited the said amount. There is an Interlocutory Application No.1551/2022 for seeking extension of time to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lacs only). 2. Today none appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter. |
||
| 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.408/2022 stands dismissed for non-compliance of the orders and non- appearance. |
¶3
[SBJ]
¶4
(SA No.408/2022) Page 1 of 2
¶5
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
¶6
ORDER SHEET
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Suvarna Vilas Pardeshi
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court