The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an original application filed by Union Bank of India against Padmakar Madan Ingle for non-prosecution, finding the applicant uninterested in proceeding.
The Original Application No.280/2022 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 21.04. Sr. No |
2023 .13 OA No. 280/2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 280/2022 | ||
| Union Bank of India ..Applicant Versus Padmakar Madan Ingle ..Defendants None for the applicant. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. None appears for the applicant. The matter was to be fixed for filing withdrawal application. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. |
||
| 2. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. |
||
| ORDER | ||
| A. The Original Application No.280/2022 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the record room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (OA No.280/2022) Page 1 of 1
Union Bank of India
Padmakar Madan Ingle
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
