In an interlocutory application filed in a securitisation matter, the applicant's advocate submitted an application before the NCLT. Relying on this submission, the tribunal dismissed the securitisation application as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Securitisation Application No.214 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.904
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1207 of 2023 In
SECURITISATION APPLICATION NO.214 of 2023
Pankaj Jayantilal Mehta … Applicant
Versus
ASREC (I) Ltd. &Ors. … Defendants
Mr Sunil Humbre i/b Ms Nikha Jain – Advocate for the applicant. Mrs Uma S. Fadia – Advocate for defendant no.1. None for other defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 9th June 2023.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
09.06.2023
Sr. No.904
| SA No.214 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Pankaj Jayantilal Mehta Vs. ASREC (I) Ltd. &Ors. |
| Mr Sunil Humbre i/b Ms Nikha Jain – Advocate for the applicant. Mrs Uma S. Fadia – Advocate for defendant no.1. None for other defendants. |
||
| 1. Order in I.A. No.1207 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the applicant’s advocate on record. Securitisation Application No.214 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. All pending IAs stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Pankaj Jayantilal Mehta
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
