The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Securitisation Application as withdrawn by the applicant after accepting their undertaking and presenting the payment schedule. All pending IAs were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
09.06.2023
Sr. No.908
SA No.212 of 2023
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
M/s. Murtuza S. Tashrifwala Vs. Fullerton India Credit Co Ltd. &Ors. |
|---|---|---|
| Ms Poonam Sawant i/b Ms Rukhsana Khan – Advocate for the applicant. Mr R. L. Motwani – Advocate for defendant no.1. None for other defendants. |
||
| 1. Ms Sawant has presented affidavit (exhibit-) giving the payment schedule, which is taken on record. The undertaking given by the applicant is accepted. 2. Based on the undertaking, Ms Sawant, representing the applicant, has made the endorsement on the |
||
| Securitisation Application withdrawing it. |
||
| Accordingly, Securitisation Application No.212 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. All pending IAs stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
M/s. Murtuza S. Tashrifwala
Fullerton India Credit Co Ltd.
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
