Secureits unlike application No.65 of 2023 Stand dismissed as withdrawn after permission granted by interlocutory application for withdrawal no replied objection from defendant.
SECERITISATION APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2023 DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITH NO ORDER AS TO COSTS
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.7
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1249 of 2023
In SECURITISATION APPLICATION NO.65 of 2023
M/s. Agate Jewellery and Ors. … Applicants Versus
ARCIL &Ors. … Defendants
Mr Rajesh Talekar – Advocate for the applicants.
Mr Neelanshu Roy i/b M/s. Sirius Legal – Advocates for defendant no.1. None for other defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 9th June 2023.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
09.06.2023
Sr. No.7
SA No.65 of 2023
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
M/s. Agate Jewellery and Ors. Vs. ARCIL &Ors. |
|---|---|---|
| Mr Rajesh Talekar – Advocate for the applicants. Mr Neelanshu Roy i/b M/s. Sirius Legal – Advocates for defendant no.1. None for other defendants. |
||
| 13 14 |
1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented I.A. No.1249 of 2022 (exihit-13) supported by affidavit (exhibit-14), which are taken on record. 2. Order in I.A. No.1249 of 2023 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1249 of 2023, |
|
| Securitisation Application No.65 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether SECILR Tribunal permitted withdrawal of securitisation application
M/s. Agate Jewellery and Ors.
ARCIL &Ors.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
