Dismissed
Yatin Hiralal Sikligar v. Idfc Bank Limited
DRTSA/174/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
¶3
ORDER SHEET
¶4
09.06.2023
¶5
Sr. No.8
¶6
SA No.174 of 2023
¶7
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr Yatin Hiralal Sikilgar & Ors. Vs. IDFC First Bank Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Ms Dimple Tejani – Advocate for the applicants. | ||
| Mr Shadab Siddiqui i/b Mr R.L. Motwani – Advocate for defendant. |
||
| 1. The learned counsel for the parties submits that the account is regularized and therefore the Securitisation Application has become infructuous. By consent of |
||
| the parties, Securitisation Application No.174 of 2023 stands dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
¶8
Nidhi
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Yatin Hiralal Sikilgar & Ors.
- respondent
IDFC First Bank Ltd.
Coram
AI extract
Presiding Officer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court