In securitization application No.174/2023, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application for non-prosecution by the applicant who had no representation.
The Securitisation Application No.174/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
20.07.2023
| S | r. No. | 23 SA No.174/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.174/2023 | ||
| Prashant s/o Bhaurao Vaidya ..Applicant Versus Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Ltd. ..Respondent |
||
| None for the applicant. 1. None present for the applicant even after pass over the |
||
| none appears for the applicants. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 2. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.174/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. Interim orders if any also stands vacated. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. | ||
| The parties may download the order from the official web- site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK] (SA No.174/2023) Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prashant s/o Bhaurao Vaidya
Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Ltd.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
