Atul Sureshrao Gargade v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
In a securitisation application, the applicant challenged an impugned order but later admitted the bank had obtained physical possession of their property. The court held the application was infructuous due to this change in title/possession and disposed of it with liberty to file a fresh application.
What did the court decide?
Securitisation Application No. 170/2022 disposed of as infructuous. All pending IAs and interim orders disposed of accordingly.