The Debts Recovery Tribunal at Aurangabad dismissed a securitisation application (No. 349/2022) without the appearance or prosecution of the applicant due to their non-compliance with previous payment orders.
Securitisation Application No. 349/2022 is dismissed for non-prosecution; pending IAs disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 18 Sr |
.07.20 . No.3 |
23 6 SA No.349/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.349/2022 | ||
| Mr. Rahul Digambar Bedke ..Applicant Versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. B.R. Kedar – Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. In this matter the applicant was absent on 14thFebruary, 2023 and 13thJune, 2023. There was an order passed by this Tribunal on 24thAugust, 2022 to make the payment of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) immediately and Rs.1,21,748/- within one month. The said orders have not been complied. |
||
| 2. None is appearing even today for the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing: ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.349/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the Record Room |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.349/2022) Page 1 of 1
Mr. Rahul Digambar Bedke
Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
