In a securitisation application, the court disposed of the matter as settled after the applicant claimed full payment of the settlement amount and closure of the account.
Securitisation Application No.143/2022 disposed as settled; all pending interlocutory applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 16. Sr. |
09.20 No.5 |
23 4 SA No.143/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.143/2022 Dnyaneshwar Tatyarao Pathrikar ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India ..Respondent |
||
| Mr. R. D. Sakhare – Advocate for the applicant. Mr. K. D. Pande – Advocate for the Respondent-Company. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the compromise took place between the parties and the entire amount of settlement has been paid by the applicant as full and final and account is closed. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant requests to dispose of the Securitisation Application. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order : ORDER A. Securitisation Application No.143/2022 stands disposed of as settled. |
||
| B. Accordingly, all Interlocutory Applications pending if any stands disposed off. |
||
| C. Consign the file to the Record Room. | ||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[ APK]
Dnyaneshwar Tatyarao Pathrikar
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
