Disposed
Kale Oil Industries v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/115/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
¶2
ORDER SHEET
¶3
16.09.2023
¶4
| S | r. No. | 31 SA No.115/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.115/2022 Kale Oil Industries ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India ..Respondents |
||
| None for the applicant. Mr. R.C.Patil – Advocate for the respondent-FI The matter is taken through VC/hybrid. 1. There is no representation on behalf of applicant since long back. The respondent bank has filed reply on 07.02.2023 still none present for applicant 2. It appears that due to loss of possession the applicants are not interested in the matter 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. |
||
| ORDER | ||
| A. Securitisation Application No.115/2022 stands dismissed with no orders as to costs. |
||
| B. Accordingly, all Interlocutory Applications pending if any stands disposed off. |
||
| C. Consign the file to the Record Room. | ||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
¶5
[APK] (SA No.115/2022)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Kale Oil Industries
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court