Miscellaneous application allowed to restore a dismissed securitisation application, holding the client should not suffer for the advocate's fault, and directing intimation to respondents.
Misc. Application No.50/2023 is allowed; Securitisation Application no. 05/2021 restored to original stage; applicant directed to intimate respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL,AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 16 Sr |
.09.20 . No.3 |
23 4 M.A No.50/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No.50/2023 | ||
| Sangita James Gaikwad ..Applicants Versus The Collector & others ..Respondents Mr. G.L.Deshpande - Advocate for the applicant. The matter is taken through Video Conference. |
||
| 1. Securitisation Application dismissed on 29.05.2023. The Tribunal is not convenience with the reasons given in the Misc application however considering the view that for the fault of advocate the client should not suffer. |
||
| 2. In view of the above, I pass the following order : ORDER A. Misc. Application No.50/2023 is allowed. |
||
| B. Registry is directed to restore the Securitisation Application no. 05/2021 at its original stage. C. The applicant is directed to intimate the respondent about the restoration of proceeding. |
||
| D. Consign the file to the Record Room. | ||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK]
Sangita James Gaikwad
The Collector & others
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
