Dismissed

Mrs Chhaya Dagdu Patil v. Bank of Maharashtra

DRT16 Sept 2023SA/29/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal dispensed with the hearing via video conference after being informed the applicant was uncontactable and non-compliant with a prior order. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the securitisation application for non-prosecution and disposed of pending interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Securitisation Application No.29/2023 is dismissed for non-prosecution; all pending interlocutory applications are disposed.

Mrs Chhaya Dagdu Patil versus Bank of Maharashtra — Company and Corporate | DRT (2023)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET

¶2

16.09.2023

¶3

Sr	. No.5	2 SA No.29/2023
Classifica tion	No. of Exh.
		SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.29/2023
		Chayya Dagdu Patil ..Applicant Versus Bank of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. Arun Rakh – Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.R.Patil - Advocate for the respondent bank The matter is taken through VC/hybrid. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the client is not in contact and he has already intimated his client through letter. The letter returned with a remark “intimation given” but notice was not collected by the applicant. 2. The Learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that the applicant has not complied the order passed by this Tribunal dated 07.02.2023. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.29/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
		B. Accordingly, all Interlocutory Applications pending if any stands disposed off. C. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site.
		(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶4

[APK]

Mrs Chhaya Dagdu Patil v. Bank of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs Chhaya Dagdu Patil v. Bank of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Canara Bank (Syndicate Bank) versus Bombay Tubes and Poles Co.

Shubhash Mangla Prasad Singh versus Enforce Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd.

Sairus J Rangoonwala And Ors. versus the Mogaveera Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

Kale Oil Industries versus State Bank of India

Sangita James Gaikwad versus the Collector /

Canara Bank versus Anantkumar Harichand Bhadake