Umesh Chandra Das v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
In Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal proceedings, the appellant challenged an order directing a 35% pre-deposit. The High Court had previously dismissed the appeal for the same reason. This Tribunal held that non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement renders the appeal not maintainable and dismissed it.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for want of pre-deposit of 35%.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Misc. Appl. Dy No. 743 of 2025
(Arising out of IA 646/2024 in S.A. 27 OF 2024 DRT Guwahati)
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
Order No. 10 18.05.2026
Sri Umesh Chandra Das, residing art House No 7, Manikanchan Path, Kailash Nagar, Maidamgaon, Beltola, Guwahati 781028 Dist. Kamrup (M) Assam.
... Appellant
--Vs--
- State Bank Of India (SARB) 2ND Floor, Signature Square, M R D. Road, Bamunimaidan, Guwahati 781021 Assam
- The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, 2ND Floor, Signature Square, M R D.Road, Bamunimaidan, Guwahati 781021 Assam
- The State Bank of India, Guwahati RACPC Branch, Swagot Square, 4th floor, ABC, G.S. Road, Bhangagarh, Guwahati, Assam 781005.
... Respondents
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal is maintainable when the appellant failed to comply with the order directing pre-deposit.
Whether the requirement of pre-deposit renders the appeal liable to be dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Umesh Chandra Das
- respondent
State Bank Of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 191090007432025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court