Tapan Majumder v. Central Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal disposed of a miscellaneous appeal under Section 17(6) of the SARFAESI Act, where the appellant sought directions for expeditious hearing. The bench held that the lower court had already fixed the matter as a specially listed matter.
What did the court decide?
Application to expedite hearing was dismissed as matter was already listed for special hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Appeal Diary No. 566 of 2025 (Arising out of I.A. 2510 of 2024 in S.A. 173 of 2023 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
Order No. 18 18.05.2026
Tapan Majumder ... Appellant -VsCentral Bank of India & 7 0thers
Respondents
Mr. Loknath Paul with Ms. Priyanka Sarkar, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Gautam Chakraborty, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 to 4/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Heard the Learned Counsel for Appellant as well as Respondent Bank and perused the record.
Instant appeal is preferred under Section 17 Sub section 6 of SARFAESI Act for a direction to the DRT-III, Kolkata for expeditious hearing of S.A. 173 of 2023.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tapan Majumder
- respondent
Central Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 191090005662025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Anil Kumar Srivastava
- Order 2 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court