Gottimukkala Subba Raju v. Kavuru Radha Kumari & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal restored the appeal to its original file following the High Court's order allowing a writ petition subject to deposit, noting the compliance but lack of record placement. It also directed notice for an IA seeking waiver of pre-deposit against the auction purchaser.
What did the court decide?
Appeal restored to original file; notice issued on IA for waiver of pre-deposit; hearing fixed.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Application Diary No. 1175 of 2025
Order No. 11 15.05.2026
Kavuru Radhakumari & Another … Appellants
-Vs-
Canara Bank & 2 Others
… Respondents
Mr. R. Padmanabha Raju, Learned Counsel for the Auction Purchaser
Mr. Nemani Srinivas with Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Learned Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 and 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
For Admission
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal is to be restored to its original file and number following the High Court order allowing the writ petition and deposit.
Whether a notice needs to be issued and opposition required for the application for waiver of pre-deposit to an auction purchaser.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kavuru Radhakumari & Another
- respondent
Canara Bank & 2 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 191090011752025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court