Soumen Chakraborty v. Aditya Birla Finance Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal by default as the appellant was absent while the respondent's counsel was present.
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal by default as the appellant was absent while the respondent's counsel was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Appl. No. 31 of 2023
(Arising out of IA 443 OF 2022 S.A. 80 of 2022 in DRT-3 Kolkata) THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
Order No. 20
14.02.2025
SOUMEN CHAKRABORTY having residence at 90 SANTOSH ROY ROAD PO- BARISHA PS- HARIDEVPUR PIN- 700008
... Appellant
--Vs--
... Respondents
For Appellant : For Respondent : Mr. Amit KR. Nag., ld. adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the revised list.
None is present for appellant.
Learned counsel for the respondent is present. Matter is dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT. Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 14th day of February, 2025.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 14.02.2025 09 /pkb
Soumen Chakraborty
Aditya Birla Finance Ltd.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court