The DBRAT dismissed the appeal in default as the appellant's counsel was absent from the hearing.
Appeal dismissed in default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Appl. No. 114 of 2019
(Arising out of O.A. 96 of 2009 – DRT Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
Order No. 24
12.02.2025
... Appellant
--Vs--
... Respondents
For Appellant : For Respondent : Mr. Avishek Guha, ld. adv. Ms. Ritika Pal, ld. adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the revised list. None is present for the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Matter is dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 12th day of February, 2025.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 12.02.2025 14 /pkb
PADHY TRADING COMPANY
Milan Distributors Prop Milan Kumar Adhikary
Kumkum Panigrahi
Indira Padhy
Siddhartha Shankar Padhy
Rani Padhy
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
