Kunidena Lalitha v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal disposed of an appeal regarding a pending correction application in a lower court, allowing the appellant to proceed once the lower court rectifies the name. No substantive decision was recorded beyond this procedural disposition.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was disposed of; appellant permitted to approach DRT-II for name correction later.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Misc. Appl. Dy No. 1105 of 2024
(Arising out of Misc. Appeal 08 of 2023 – DRAT Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
Order No. 27
13.02.2025
KUNIDENA LALITHA
... Appellant
--Vs--
STATE BANK OF INDIA office SARB D.No. 1-8-563/1, 1st floor, Opp. Sandhya Teatre, RTC Cross Road, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad, Telangana 509202.
R. Sheshagiri Rao, residing at Villa No. 140, LIG BHEL, Ramachandrapuram, Sanga Reddy Dist. 509202.
... Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Ashish Mayanch, ld. adv. on virtual mode For Respondent :
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kunidena Lalitha
- respondent
State Bank of India
- respondent
R. Sheshagiri Rao
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 191090011052024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court