The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal admitted the appeal regarding a directed suit. The court directed appellants to substitute expired respondents' legal representatives within two weeks.
Directed appellants to move application for substitution of respondents within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 114 of 2019)
(Arising out of O.A. 96 of 2009 in DRT- Cuttack )
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.12.2022
Padhy Trading Co. & Ors
… Appellants
-Vs-
ICICI Bank Ltd. & Ors.
… Respondents Mr. Gourav Singh, ld. counsel for the appellant.
Mr. S. Naskar, ld. Adv. With Ms. S. Sen, ld. Adv. For respondent no.1. Ms. D. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 to 7.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Appeal is admitted.
Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 to 7 submits that respondent no. 3 and 5 have expired. Appellant is directed to move appropriate application for substitution within a period of two weeks. Thereafter notice be issued to the proposed legal representatives. Affidavit of service be filed within a week thereafter.
List the matter on 15.03.2023 for hearing of the substitution application.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 22 December, 2022 11/pkb
Padhy Trading Co. & Ors.
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
