Padhy Trading Company v. Icici Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 114 of 2019
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
04.09.2023 Padhy Trading Company & 6 Others … Appellants -VsICICI Bank Limited Bank Limited & 6 Others ... Respondents
Mr. Nimish Mishra with Mr. Gaurav Singh, Learned Counsel for the Appellants
Ms. Shreyasi Sen, Counsel for Respondent No. 1
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Appellant submits that Respondent No. 5, legal representative of Respondent No. 4, is already on record but no substitution application is moved. Appellants should file substitution application within a week.
As far as Respondent No. 3 is concerned, who died pending appeal, no substitution application is filed; accordingly, appeal stands abated so far Respondent No. 3 is concerned.
Rejoinder filed by Appellants is taken on record.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Padhy Trading Company & 6 Others
- respondent
ICICI Bank Limited Bank Limited & 6 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court