Satyabhama Namita Dalai And Others v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant moved miscellaneous application regarding notices under the SARFAESI Act. Tribunal found notices withdrawn by the Bank and held application infructuous. Dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Miscellaneous Application dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.A.s disposed of accordingly. Interim order vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Application Dy. No. 855 of 2023
(Arising out of Dy. No. 28 of 2021)
Order No. 30 12.02.2025
Satyabhama @ Namita Dalai & Ors.
-Vs-
UCO Bank & Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. Subhojit Ghosh, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Mr. Sailesh Mishra, Learned Counsel for the Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
On the basis of instructions received Learned Counsel for the Respondent Bank submits that the Notice under Section 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act have been withdrawn by the Bank. A letter to this effect is brought on record by the Learned Counsel.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Satyabhama @ Namita Dalai & Ors.
- respondent
UCO Bank & Ors.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 191090008552023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sukhendu Kumar Narjary
- Order 2 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court