Ramesh Bhachu Arethia v. Bank of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appeals Tribunal Mumbai declined to register an appeal filed by Ramesh Bhachu Arethia against the Bank of Maharashtra because the appellant failed to remove defects pointed out by the Registry despite sufficient opportunity.
What did the court decide?
The Appeal (Diary) No. 1177/12/2024 is declined for registration and the matter is presumed as abandoned.
What the court decided
n
Debts BecoYeryAppeltaleTribunal'Mumbai
Appeal(DiarY)No. 117712024
RameshBhachu Arethia
... ...ApPellants
-Vs-
... ... ResPondents
Bank Of Maharashtra& Ors'
Appeal(Diary)No. 1 17712024is listed on today's board(09'05'2025) before theLd.Registraralll'30AMforcompliance/removalofdefects.Thesaid Board is displayedin Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and alsoon the NoticeBoardof DRAT Mumbai'
NoneappearedfortheAppellantwhenmatteriscalledout'
ThisAppeal(Diary)No'1177t2o24wasfiledon03.06.2024andcertain objectionswere,,i,"obytheRegistryforcompliance/removalofdefects. However,despitesufficieni opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defectstill date'
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an appeal filed without compliance with registry defects can be registered.
Whether the appellate tribunal may decline registration of an appeal due to non-compliance.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramesh Bhachu Arethia
- respondent
Bank Of Maharashtra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 271090011772024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
James Automotive Private Limited through Its Director Mr James Shashikant Ujagare versus the Karad Urban Cooperative Bank Limited
Abhinav Education Society versus Bank of Baroda
R.C. Ganesan and 24 Others versus Authorized Officer of Allahabad Bank Asset Recovery Management Branch, Mumbai and Others
ajay ramniwas dhoot versus Idbi Bank