ajay ramniwas dhoot v. Idbi Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Registrar declined to register an appeal filed by Ajay Ramnivas Dhoot against IDBI Bank Ltd. because the appellant failed to remove cited defects after being given sufficient opportunity, leading to a presumption of non-interest in the proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Decline to register Appeal (Diary) No. 1018/2024.
What the court decided
Appeal(DiarY)No. 101812024
Ajay RamniwasDhoot
... ...ApPellants
-Vs-
at
... ... ResPondents
IDBI BankLtd.
Appeal(Diary)No. 101 812024is listed on today's board(09'05'2025) before the Ld. Registrarat 11.30 AM for compliance/removalof defects' The said Board is displayedin Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the NoticeBoard of DRAT Mumbai'
NoneappearedfortheAppellantwhenmatteriscalledout.
ThisAppeal(Diary)No.1o18l2o24wasfiledon09.05.2024.andcertain objectionswereraiseo by the Registryfor compliance/removalof defects' However,despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defectstill date.
Therefore,it is presumed that,the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal can be registered when the appellant failed to comply with registry objections to remove defects despite sufficient opportunity.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ajay Ramnivas Dhoot
- respondent
IDBI Bank Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 271090010182024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
James Automotive Private Limited through Its Director Mr James Shashikant Ujagare versus the Karad Urban Cooperative Bank Limited
Abhinav Education Society versus Bank of Baroda
R.C. Ganesan and 24 Others versus Authorized Officer of Allahabad Bank Asset Recovery Management Branch, Mumbai and Others
Dr. Shital Vinay Patil versus Phoenix Arc Private Limited