The Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dismissed an appeal due to the appellant's failure to comply with registry objections to remove defects, deeming the appellant not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DeFts RecoveryAppellate Tri,bunal'Mumbai
APPeal(DiarY)No' 123012023
R C Ganesan& ors.
"' "'Appellants
-Vs-
A.O AllahabadBank Asset RecoveryManagement Branch , Mumbai & ors'
......ResPondents
^
Appeal(Diary)No. 1230/2023 is listed on today's board (07-05.2025) before in" lo. Registraral 11.30 AM for compliance/removalof defects.The said Board is displayedin Public Notice on the websiteof DRT/DRAT and also on the NoticeBoard of DRAT Mumbai'
None appearedfor the Appetlantwhen matter is calledout'
I-his Appeal(Diary) No. 1230t2023 was filed on 19.07'2023and certain objectionswereraised by the Registryfor compliance/removalof defects' However,despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defectstill date'
Therefore,it i,pr".umed that,the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
ln view ofthe above& under the provisions of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 of DRAT 1ee4 the Appeal(Diarv) No' 1230/2023is herebvdecrined sll,rlll*.:x:"''
4^^--"L
Date: 07.05.2025
Registrar DRAT Mumbai
!
R C Ganesan & ors.
A.O Allahabad Bank Asset Recovery Management Branch, Mumbai & ors.
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
