Dr. Shital Vinay Patil v. Phoenix Arc Private Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar of DRAT Mumbai dismissed the appeal filed by Dr. Shital Vinay Patil & Ors. against Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. for non-registration due to failure to address registry objections within the afforded timeframe.
What did the court decide?
The appeal (Diary No. 1225/2024) was declined for registration under Sub Rule (a) of Rule 6 of DRAT (procedure) Rules, 1994.
What the court decided
Debts RecoveryAppellateTribunal. Mumbai
APPeal(DiarY)No' 122512024
Dr. ShitalVinaYPatil & Ors.
... ...Appellants
-Vs-
n
... ... Respondents
Phoenix ARCPvt. Ltd.
Appeat(Diary)No. 122512024is listed on today's board (09.05.2025)before the Ld. Registrarat 11.30 AM for compliance/removalof defects.The said Board is displayedin Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the NoticeBoard of DRAT Mumbai'
None appearedfor the Appellantwhen matter is calledout'
This Appeal(Diary) No. 1225t2024 was filed on 10.06.2024 and certain objectionswereraised by the Registryfor compliance/removalof defects' However, despitesufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defectstill date'
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal should be registered where the appellant failed to remove registry objections despite sufficient opportunity.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dr. ShitalVinay Patil & Ors.
- respondent
Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Registrar DRAT Mumbai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
James Automotive Private Limited through Its Director Mr James Shashikant Ujagare versus the Karad Urban Cooperative Bank Limited
Abhinav Education Society versus Bank of Baroda
R.C. Ganesan and 24 Others versus Authorized Officer of Allahabad Bank Asset Recovery Management Branch, Mumbai and Others
ajay ramniwas dhoot versus Idbi Bank