N Rajashekar v. Dhanalakshmi Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
An appeal filed by N. Rajashekar was dismissed because the appellant sought and obtained permission to withdraw the appeal, resulting in the dismissal of AIR (SA) 950/2025 as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted. Appeal AIR (SA) 950/2025 dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 18th Day of July, 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
AIR (SA) 950/2025
(Arising out of IA 452/2018 in MASR No.12662/2017 in SA No.325/2008 on the file of DRT-I, Bangaluru, Karnataka)
Between
N. Rajashekar S/o Late S Nanjappa, No.45, Gaigere “A” Lane, Nagartathpet Cross, Bangalore 560 002. ….Appellant
And
- The Authorised Officer, 4. Sri N. Krishna Murthy, The Dhanalakshmi Bank S/o Sr. Nanjappa, Ltd. No.32, Gangamma Temple Peenya Branch, PIA Street, Chowllagalli Cross, Bhawan, Cubbon Pet, Peenya Industrial Estate, Bengaluru 560 086. Bangaluru 560 058.
- Smt. Jayalakshmamma, 2. M/s Vigor Steels, W/o Late S. Nanjappa, No.C-94, Peenaya II Stage, No.32, Gangamma Temple Peenya Industrial Area, Street, Bengaluru. Chow lagalli Cross, Cubbon Pet,
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N. Rajashekar
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Dhanalakshmi Bank
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090009502025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court