M/s Neo Furniture v. Bank of Baroda (Dena Bank)
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an interim application for non-compliance with a conditional order, consequently rejecting the underlying appeal. The Tribunal directed parties to bear their own costs and closed pending IAs.
What did the court decide?
Conditional order dated 19/06/2025 in IA No. 20/2015 was not complied with. Appeal AIR 1230/2023 rejected. Pending IAs closed.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 21st day of July, 2025
PRESENT: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
CHAIRPERSON
IA 20/2025 (Delay)
In
AIR 1230/2023
(Arising out of OA 353/2017 on the file of
DRT-I, Bangaluru)
Between
- M/s. Neo Furniture A Partnership Firm, Having its Registered Office at No.8/1, Byandahalli Village, Near Janapriya Apartments, Kadabagere Cross, Magadi Road, Bengaluru 562 130. Rep. by its Parners
- (a) Smt. Kavitha T.N. (b) Sri Jayadevappa V.N.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Neo Furniture A Partnership Firm
- appellant
Smt. Kavitha T.N.
- appellant
Sri Jayadevappa V.N.
- respondent
The Dena Bank
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court