D Vaithiyalingam v. Indian Overseas Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an adjournment application due to non-prosecussion by the appellants (vaithiyalingam and others). Consequently, the underlying appeal was rejected for default in appearing before the court.
What did the court decide?
Application for delay adjournment dismissed; Appeal rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 12th day of November, 2024
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 413/2023 (Delay) in AIR 889/2023
(Arising out of O.A.No.627/2017 on the file of DRT-III, Chennai)
Between
- D. Vaithiyalingam, S/o. Late. P. Devendiran, No. 5, Kaliamman Nagar, Mangadu, Chennai – 56.
- Kanniyammal,
W/o. Late. P. Devendiran, No. 5, Kaliamman Nagar, Mangadu, Chennai – 56.
- D. Manikandan, S/o. Late. P. Devendiran, No. 5, Kaliamman Nagar, Mangadu, Chennai – 56.
- Ms. Janakai, D/o. Late. P. Devendiran, No. 5, Kaliamman Nagar, Mangadu, Chennai – 56.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed in the absence of the appellant's representation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
D. Vaithiyalingam
- appellant
Kanniyammal
- appellant
D. Manikandan
- appellant
Ms. Janakai
- appellant
Mr. P. Devendiran
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090008892023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court