Sri M Subramnaian v. Citi Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal dismissed the application as 'not pressed' upon permission being granted for withdrawal, allowing the appellant to agitate the grounds in a pending appeal challenging the final order in the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 11th day of November, 2024
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
CHAIRPERSON
IA 289/2023
In
AIR (SA) 520/2023
(Arising out of I.A.No.631/2022 in D.No.75/2021 on the file of DRT-I, Bengaluru)
Between
Sri. M. Subramanian. Aged 47 years, S/o. Hari Boothisa Murugesan M. Presently residing at 31/1, Old Plot No. 16 A, 6th Cross, Thiruvalluvar Nagar,
Palanganatham, Madurai – 625 003 (Tamil Nadu).
..... Appellant
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit withdrawal of the application 'not pressed'
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Subramanian
- respondent
The Authorized Officer, Citi Bank N.A.
- respondent
K. R. Vinod Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090005202023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court