The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the delay application filed by the appellant. The order had directed payment of Rs.5000/- for condoning delay, but the appellant failed to comply. Consequently, the pending appeal was rejected.
IA 557/2022 dismissed; Appeal AIR (SA) 409/2022 rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 12th day of November, 2024
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 557/2022 (Delay)
In
AIR (SA) 409/2022
(Arising out of I.A.No.3539/2022 in S.A.No.867/2022 on the file of DRT, Coimbatore)
Between
Mr . Lukman Julfair Ali. A, S/o. Abdul Kadar, No. 25-H No.25, Mohamethiyar Street, B.P. Agraharam, Erode – 638 005.
..... Appellant
And
The Authorised Officer, M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd, Dare House, 2, NSC Bose Road, Parry’s, Chennai – 600 001.
….. Respondent
Counsel for Appellant : M/s. B.Thirunavukkarasu, R. Sriram & M. Gopi Counsel for Respondent : M/s. Kishore Balasubramanian
ORDER
It is seen from the proceedings dated 23.10.2024 that there was a direction to petitioner/appellant to pay costs of Rs.5000/- to DRT & DRAT Association, Chennai for condoning the delay of 32 days in 32 days within two weeks i.e., on or before 7.11.2024.
There is no representation for petitioner/appellant today and the said condition is not complied with.
Therefore, this application IA 557/2022 (Delay) is dismissed for non compliance of conditional order dated 23.11.2024. Consequently, Appeal AIR (SA) 409/2022 is rejected.
Sd/(JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN) CHAIRPERSON
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim appeal filed by the appellant should be allowed from the impugned order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal?
Whether the costs of Rs.5000/- imposed on the appellant for condoning delay have been complied with by the appellant?
Mr. Lukman Julfair Ali A
The Authorised Officer, M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd
G. Chandrasekharan
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
