Messrs Kps Ginning v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This Tribunal dismissed an application seeking waiver of statutory deposit for entertaining an appeal due to the appellants' non-appearance and failure to file a withdrawal memo by the stipulated deadline.
What did the court decide?
Disposal of the reimbursement application resulting in the rejection of the underlying appeal.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 11th day of November, 2024
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 62/2023 In
AIR (SA) 476/2022 (Arising out of S.A.496/2021 on the file of DRT, Coimbatore)
Between
- M/s. KPS Ginning, Rep by its Partner Mr. Chandrasekaran. 2/147, Kannaderi Post, Sankari Taluk, Salem Dist – 637 102.
- Mr. Chandrasekaran (Partner). S/o. Sindhan. 2/147, Kannaderi Post, Sankari Taluk, Salem Dist – 637 102.
..... Appellants
And
The Authorised Officer, Union Bank of India, Office at 239, Vidhan Bhawan Mard, Narimman Point, Mumbai – 400 021. And inter alia a branch at Vembadithalam, Salem 637 504.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. KPS Ginning
- appellant
Mr. Chandrasekaran
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court