S.Selvaraj v. Corporation Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Chairperson dismissed the application for condonation of delay and rejected the appeal, holding the appellant failed to prove genuineness and appeared to simply protract proceedings.
What did the court decide?
The application for condonation of delay was dismissed; consequently, the appeal was rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 8th day of November, 2024
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 550/2022 (Delay)
In
AIR 260/2022
(Arising out of MA 37/2021 in OA 97/2014 on the file of DRT, Coimbatore)
Between
Mr. S. Selvaraj, S/o. Sebastian, Residing at D. No. 11/17-B, Kambar Street, Vellalore, Coimbatore.
..... Appellant
And
- Corporation Bank, Rep by its Chief Manager, Thirupur Main Branch, No. 300/1, Mangalam Road, Thirupur.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 36 days in filing the appeal?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. S. Selvaraj
- respondent
Corporation Bank
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
23 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court