Arcil v. Nil Ratan Dey and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
DRTA Kolkata dismissed the appeal in default due to the non-appearance of the appellant, who filed no counter-affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Appl. No. 135 of 2018
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
Order No. 27 11.07.2024
2.The Authorised Officer, ARCIL, at 33A, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Kolkata-700071
... Appellant
--Vs--
... Respondents
For Appellant : None
For Respondent : Mr. D. K. Sengupta, ld. adv. Ms. Farhen Mustaque, ld. adv. Ms. Sweta Saha, ld. adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up today for hearing. None is present for the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Matter is dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 11th day of July, 2024.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 11.07.2024 16 /pkb
ARCIL
Nil Ratan Dey
Sukhaniloy Co Operative Housing Society Limited
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court