Bank long back and the Intervenor had knowledge of the same since 2022. It is further submitted that in the garb of the intervention Application, Intervenor is trying to make out the grounds challenging the SARFAESI action of the Bank. It is further submitted that the Learned DRT has recorded that the Intervenor has interest in the secured assets and Civil Suit for partition is also pending. 5. As far as the rights of the Intervenor are concerned, Learned DRT has allowed the intervention Application to an extent that the Intervenor be impleaded as an opposite party No. 4 in the array of parties. Accordingly, as far as the contention of challenging the SARFAESI actions of the Bank are concerned, as an opposite party to the SARFAESI Proceedings Intervenor could not challenge those SARFAESI actions. Rather, as an opposite party he can protect his own rights, if available under the law. However, if any such grievance is raised or application for such relief is moved by the Intervenor during the pendency of the S.A., Appellant Bank would have full opportunity to raise the issues and challenge the same which should be decided by the Learned DRT in accordance with law.
