Arcil v. Nil Ratan Dey and Anr.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 135 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. 375 of 2016 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
18.04.2022 Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited (ARCIL) … Appellant -vs-
Nil Ratan Dey & Another … Respondents
Mr. Prbhat Sil with Mr. Rohit Das and Ms. Kishwar Rahaman, Learned Counsel for Appellant
None for Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for two weeks’ time and is granted two weeks time to file rejoinder; advance copy whereof be served upon Respondents.
List the matter on 5th July, 2022 for hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited (ARCIL)
- respondent
Nil Ratan Dey
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court