The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal disposed of the withdrawn appeal as the underlying matter had been settled between the appellant and respondent bank.
The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 459/2022 (WoD) In
Appeal on Diary No. 747/2022
Between
M/s. Primus Realtors Pvt. Ltd. …` Appellant/s V/s. Union Bank of India & Anr. …Respondent/s
An Advocate for the Appellant is present.
An Advocate for the Respondent is present.
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of a praecipe filed by the Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that the matter has been settled with the Respondent bank and seeks to withdraw the appeal.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 also agrees that the matter has been settled.
The permission is granted and the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-02 (SB)
1
M/s. Primus Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
Union Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
