M/S Sumit Service Station And 2 Ors. v. Uco Bank And Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 242/2022 Date: 12.01.2023
M/s Sumit Service Station Vs. UCO Bank
Present: None for the appellant, Shri A. K. Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sanjai Singh, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank prays for some time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
The office report dated 11.01.2023 shows that the impleadment application was allowed and the appellant was directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the array of paties, but the same has not been done. Let the necessary amendment be carried out in the array of parties by the next date.
List this case along with appeal Dy. No. 586/2022 on 11.04.2023 for reply. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Sumit Service Station
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 091090002422022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court