M/S Sumit Service Station And 2 Ors. v. Uco Bank And Anr.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 242/2022 Date: 03.06.2022
M/s Sumit Service Station Vs. UCO Bank
Present: Shri Anil Kumar Singh, counsel for the appellant,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the amount of Rs. 56.00 lacs has already been deposited with the Bank. Learned counsel seeks time to deposit the amount for making 25% amount of the due for entertaining the appeal.
List this case on 07.06.2022 for waiver.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant should be granted time to deposit 25% of the due amount to entertain the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Sumit Service Station
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Justice R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 091090002422022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court